Income inequality in Canada: Part 4 – simplified data

In parts 2 and 3, one of the issues with interpreting the plots was that there was too much data.  In this post, I have simplified the data by combining some of the family income baskets together.  Deciding which baskets to combine is a subjective exercise which is why I started the analysis with the full dataset.

Methodology:

I used the same data as in parts 2 and 3 and combined the income brackets to get the below datasets:

cansim_202_0201_1_1

cansim-2020201_1a_1

cansim-2020201_1ua_1

With the new datasets, I re-ran the same R code shown in part 2.

Results:

Using simplified datasets, we obtain plots that are easier to interpret.

Positive Analysis: Figures 1b and 2b show that the proportion of people in the highest income bracket has grown over time.  Figure 3b shows that the distribution of of market income for unattached individuals has remained fairly stable over the time series.  Therefore the increase in the proportion of population in the highest income bracket is mostly represented by families of 2 of more individuals.  Figures 1b and 2b show that for families, the proportion of the population in the 50k-99,999 range has gradually decreased over time.

Normative Analysis: Although the graphs do show some growth in the highest income bracket and some decline in the middle income brackets, the change has been both small and slow.  There are no trends in these graphs that I find alarming.  The situation that I would find concerning would be a large decrease in middle income with a large increase in lower income and a slight increase in higher income.  However, this does not appear to be the case.

The question that I ask myself is why has so little changed? Especially with respect to unattached individuals, the distribution of income has varied very little over time.  One would think that with all the advances in education, healthcare, social programs, and technology, that the unattached individuals of 2011 would be much more productive than in 1976.  Shouldn’t that increase in productivity have resulted in higher wages in the labour market?

Post_4_Fig_1b

Post_4_Fig_2b
Post_4_Fig_3b

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s